Skip to main content

Association between triglyceride–glucose index and mortality in critically ill patients with atrial fibrillation: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Background

The triglyceride–glucose (TyG) index, an emerging surrogate marker of insulin resistance, has been implicated in adverse cardiovascular outcomes. However, its prognostic value in critically ill patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between the TyG index and all-cause mortality in this high-risk population.

Methods

We identified critically ill patients with AF from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database and categorized them into tertiles based on their TyG index levels. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, with 90-day and 365-day all-cause mortality as secondary outcomes. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and restricted cubic splines were used to elucidate the relationship between the TyG index and all-cause mortality. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed to visualize survival differences among the tertiles.

Results

A total of 1473 patients were included; the 30-day, 90-day, and 365-day all-cause mortality rates were 26.8%, 33.3%, and 41.1%, respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that the TyG index was independently associated with mortality at 30 days [hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) 1.26 (1.09–1.45), P = 0.002], 90 days [HR (95% CI) 1.27 (1.11–1.45), P < 0.001], and 365 days [HR (95% CI) 1.24 (1.10–1.40), P < 0.001]. Restricted cubic splines regression showed a positive linear association between the TyG index and mortality risk. Kaplan–Meier survival curves further confirmed the significant survival disparities across TyG index tertiles.

Conclusions

A significant linear association was observed between higher TyG index and increased all-cause mortality at 30, 90, and 365 days in critically ill patients with AF. This underscores the role of the TyG index as a key prognostic indicator for risk stratification and management in intensive care.

Background

Cardiovascular diseases continue to be the leading cause of disease burden worldwide [1]. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major cardiovascular health problem characterized by a profound disorder in atrial electrical activity, leading to the impairment of effective atrial contractions [2]. AF is closely associated with severe complications, including stroke, sudden cardiac death, and heart failure, and has a substantial and growing impact on public health worldwide [1, 3]. The prevalence of AF rises with age, from 0.1% in individuals under 55 to 9.0% in those aged 80 and older [4]. In intensive care units (ICUs), the incidence of AF can be 15.6% or even higher [5, 6]. Patients in the ICU with AF often experience multiple complications, complex health issues, and a high risk of mortality [7]. Existing evidence has established a strong correlation between hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and AF development [8, 9], with insulin resistance (IR) playing a crucial role in these pathological processes [10, 11]. Several studies have reported correlations among IR and AF prognosis, its recurrence after ablation, and its occurrence in the general population [12,13,14,15].

IR, defined by the diminished ability of insulin to facilitate glucose transport into cells, is a key feature of metabolic syndromes that disrupt metabolic pathways across multiple organs [16, 17]. The TyG index, initially proposed as a marker for identifying IR in healthy individuals [18], has recently gained attention as a cost-effective alternative. The integration of fasting triglyceride and glucose levels provides a simple surrogate for IR. The TyG index is linked to a range of health outcomes, encompassing cardiovascular disease, arterial stiffness, and cancer [19,20,21]. Furthermore, it contributes to the risk assessment of conditions such as diabetes, stroke, renal conditions, and coronary artery disease [22,23,24,25,26]. The TyG index has been associated with all-cause mortality in patients with diverse underlying conditions in intensive care units [27,28,29], underscoring its potential as a mortality risk marker. However, the relationship between the TyG index and mortality in ICU patients with AF remains unclear.

This study aimed to explore the association between the TyG index and all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with AF using data from the Medical Information Market for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database.

Materials and methods

Data source

This retrospective analysis used the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV, Version 3.1) database, which is a comprehensive and publicly accessible resource that includes records of ICU admissions at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, MA, USA, from 2008 to 2019. All personal identifiers were removed to protect patient privacy. Ethical approval, including a consent waiver, was obtained from the MIT and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Review Boards. The author, Rong Ding, completed an online course on human research participant protection offered by the US National Institutes of Health, securing access to the dataset. The certificate number was 64,760,223. This study adhered to the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines and complied with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki [30].

Study population

This study included patients with AF who were hospitalized and admitted to the ICU for the first time. The diagnosis of AF was confirmed using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9/10 codes (Supplementary Table 1). The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) multiple hospital admissions, (2) lack of serum fasting blood glucose and triglyceride data on the first day of ICU admission, and (3) death or discharge within 24 h of ICU admission.

Demographical and laboratory variables

Structured query language was used to gather data on patient demographics (age, sex, height, weight, and race); medical history (hypertension, diabetes, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, chronic pulmonary disease, cerebrovascular disease, paraplegia, renal disease, malignant cancer, sepsis, and acute kidney injury); initial laboratory parameters (white blood cell count, platelet count, hemoglobin, sodium, potassium, calcium, blood glucose, anion gap, international normalized ratio, triglycerides, bicarbonate, and creatinine); medications (aspirin, clopidogrel, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blocker, digitalis, diuretics, amiodarone, insulin, statins, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, heparin, and warfarin); special treatments (continuous renal replacement therapy and vasoactive drug and mechanical ventilation); important scoring systems (SAPS II score, OASIS score); vital sign (heart rate, mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate, and pulse oximetry-derived oxygen saturation); and survival time. All laboratory parameters were recorded on the first day of the initial ICU admission.

The primary exposure in this study was the TyG index, a composite measure of fasting triglycerides and fasting blood glucose, calculated using the formula: TyG index = ln [fasting TG (mg/dL) × FBG (mg/dL)] / 2 [20].

The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoints were 90-day and 365-day all-cause mortality. Deaths were recorded as events that occurred within a specific time frame of ICU admission.

Statistical analysis

In this study, critically ill patients diagnosed with AF were grouped into three categories based on TyG index tertiles and additionally divided into two groups according to their 30-day survival status. The baseline characteristics are described for each group. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range), whereas categorical variables are shown as numbers and frequency percentiles (%). Fisher’s exact test or Pearson’s chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables across groups.

Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to evaluate the incidence of endpoint events across varying TyG index levels, and differences were assessed using the log-rank test. The relationship between the TyG index and the study endpoints was determined using Cox proportional hazards models, providing hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Covariates were selected if their addition to the model changed the matched HR by at least 10% or based on previous findings and clinical considerations. The variance inflation factor method was used to test for multicollinearity, with a variance inflation factor of five or higher indicating multicollinearity. None of the variables showed multicollinearity (Supplementary Table 2). Three models were used to adjust for confounders: Model 1 (baseline model, not adjusted), Model 2 (adjusted for age, sex, weight, race, hypertension, diabetes, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, malignant cancer, chronic pulmonary disease, and renal disease), and Model 3 (adjusted covariates in Model 2 and heart rate, mean arterial pressure, white blood cell count, hemoglobin, international normalized ratio, creatinine, potassium, sodium, insulin, beta-blockers, statins, amiodarone, and digitalis). Both continuous and tertile-based TyG indices were examined, and the P-value for the trend was calculated across the TyG tertiles.

Restricted cubic spline models were applied to explore the potential linear relationships between TyG levels and all-cause mortality rates at 30, 90, and 365 days. Subgroup analyses were conducted for age (< 65 or > = 65 years), sex, race, hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, and malignant cancer, with interaction effects evaluated via P-values. These findings are presented as forest plots.

All analyses were conducted using R version 4.2.2 (http://www.R-project.org, R Foundation) and Free Statistics software (version 2.0). A statistical P-value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics of study subjects

The final study cohort included 1,473 individuals, as shown in Fig. 1. The median hospital stay was 13.9 days for survivors and 8.9 days for non-survivors. Participants were stratified into tertiles according to the TyG index: T1 (≤ 8.54, n = 491), T2 (8.54–9.09, n = 491), and T3 (> 9.09, n = 491). The baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1 and Supplementary Tables 3 and 4.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of the study cohort. MIMIC-IV, Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV; ICU, Intensive Care Unit

Table 1 Baseline characteristics and outcomes of participants classified by TyG index tertiles

Patients in T3 were younger but had higher body weights and a greater proportion of males compared with T1. From T1 to T3, an upward trend was observed in heart rate, respiratory rate, potassium, anion gap, creatinine, white blood cells, triglycerides, glucose, and TyG index, whereas the mean arterial pressure, sodium, calcium, bicarbonate, and hemoglobin showed a decline. Clinical severity, as indicated by the SAPS II and OASIS scores, progressively increased with increasing TyG tertiles. Additionally, the prevalence of type 2 diabetes, myocardial infarction, renal disease, sepsis, and acute kidney injury increased from T1 to T3, whereas cerebrovascular disease and paraplegia showed decreasing trends.

TyG and mortality

Of the 1,473 patients, 395 (26.8%), 491 (33.3%), and 605 (41.1%) died within 30, 90, and 365 days of follow-up, respectively. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed to compare mortality rates among patients categorized into tertiles based on the TyG index. Patients with higher TyG indices exhibited significantly higher all-cause mortality rates at 30, 90, and 365 days than those with lower TyG indices. Moreover, there were notable differences in mortality rates among the three groups, with log-rank P-values of 0.0022, 0.0050, and 0.0017, respectively. Figure 2 illustrates the detailed results of the analysis.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Kaplan–Meier survival analysis curve for all-cause mortality in the overall study population. A 28-day mortality; B 90-day mortality; C 365-day mortality. TyG index: T1 (TyG index ≤ 8.54), T2 (8.54 < TyG index ≤ 9.09, T3 (TyG index>9.09)

Using Cox proportional hazards analysis, we evaluated the relationship between the TyG index and 30-day mortality. When considered a continuous variable, the TyG index was identified as a significant risk factor across all models: unadjusted [HR (95% CI) 1.31 (1.16–1.48), P < 0.001] and fully adjusted [HR (95% CI) 1.23 (1.06–1.43), P = 0.005]. Similarly, when the TyG index was categorized, the highest tertile group showed a notably increased risk of 30-day mortality in both the initial Model 1 [HR (95% CI) 1.54 (1.20–1.97), P = 0.001] and fully adjusted Model 3 [HR (95% CI) 1.39 (1.05–1.83), P = 0.021] compared with the lowest tertile. This indicates an increasing trend in mortality risk associated with higher TyG index levels. Cox regression analysis for 90-day and 365-day mortality rates mirrored this trend (Table 2).

Table 2 Multivariate Cox regression analyses for 30-day, 90-day, and 365-day mortality

Furthermore, restricted cubic spline regression modeling demonstrated a linear relationship between TyG index levels and the risk of mortality at 30, 90, and 365 days (P for nonlinearity = 0.818, 0.911, and 0.909, respectively), as shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Association between TyG index and all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with atrial fibrillation. A 28-day mortality; B 90-day mortality; C 365-day mortality. Solid and dashed lines represent the predicted values and 95% confidence intervals, respectively. Adjusted for age, sex, weight, race, hypertension, diabetes, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, malignant cancer, chronic pulmonary disease, renal disease, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, white blood cell count, hemoglobin, international normalized ratio, creatinine, potassium, sodium, insulin, beta-blockers, statins, amiodarone, and digitalis. TyG index, triglyceride-glucose index

Subgroup analysis

Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the TyG index in stratifying the mortality risk across various factors, including age, sex, race, hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, and malignant cancer (Fig. 4). A consistent positive association between the TyG index and mortality was found in most subgroups, particularly among patients aged ≥ 65 years. The TyG index showed a stronger prognostic value in non-diabetic individuals, with HRs (95% CIs) for 30, 90, and 365 days of 1.43 (1.17–1.74), 1.44 (1.21–1.73), and 1.40 (1.18–1.65), respectively, compared with 0.93 (0.74–1.17), 0.95 (0.77–1.17), and 0.98 (0.82–1.18) in patients with diabetes. The interaction P-values (0.046, 0.051, and 0.056) suggested a potential interaction that requires further investigation.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Subgroup analyses of the association between TyG index and all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with atrial fibrillation. A 28-day mortality; B 90-day mortality; C 365-day mortality. Adjusted for age, sex, weight, race, hypertension, diabetes, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, malignant cancer, chronic pulmonary disease, renal disease, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, white blood cell count, hemoglobin, international normalized ratio, creatinine, potassium, sodium, insulin, beta-blockers, statins, amiodarone, and digitalis. TyG index, triglyceride-glucose index

Discussion

Our study comprehensively evaluated the relationship between the TyG index and all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with AF using the MIMIC database. We found that higher TyG index values were consistently linked to increased 30-, 90-, and 365-day mortality, even after adjusting for potential confounding factors. We identified a linear dose-response relationship, suggesting the clinical utility of early risk stratification in ICU settings, where patients with AF face heightened mortality rates.

AF is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia, and its incidence escalates with advancing age [31]. AF is not solely an atrial issue; it is linked to systemic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, metabolic disturbances, and changes in myocardial structure and function [32]. Metabolic stress and remodeling further increase AF susceptibility, influencing atrial function through alterations in glucose, lipid, and ketone metabolism, mitochondrial function, and myofibrillar energetics [33]. Research has shown that metabolic disorders increase the risk of death in patients with AF [34]. Identifying biomarkers for evaluating disease severity in individuals affected by AF is a pivotal field of research.

IR is not only the main component of diabetes mellitus but also a modulator of AF substrate development [34]. The potential mechanisms underlying IR-induced mortality in patients with AF are multifaceted. IR-induced activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway and upregulation of transforming growth factor-beta 1 promote atrial fibrosis and electrical remodeling [35, 36]. Second, metabolic dysregulation associated with IR leads to chronic inflammation and oxidative stress, which exacerbate endothelial dysfunction [37,38,39]. Third, excessive fatty acid oxidation in cardiomyocytes exceeds their mitochondrial oxidative capacity, leading to mitochondrial overload and cardiomyocyte injury [40]. As a validated surrogate for IR [41,42,43], the TyG index effectively captures these pathological cascades and serves as a comprehensive marker of underlying metabolic and inflammatory disturbances in patients with AF. Some studies have shown that it is superior to the traditional assessment method homeostatic model assessment of IR [44, 45]. In critically ill patients, an elevated TyG index reflects worsening metabolic disorders and IR, which further exacerbates systemic inflammation and organ dysfunction, significantly increasing the mortality risk in those with AF [46, 47].

Growing evidence supports TyG’s prognostic value across cardiovascular domains [28, 48,49,50]. For instance, a high TyG index has been shown to be independently associated with poor outcomes in acute heart failure as well as with the risk of developing hypertension and myocardial infarction. Previous studies have primarily investigated the link between the TyG index and the incidence or recurrence of AF across different populations [14, 51, 52], as well as its connection to adverse complications in patients with AF [53]. A study on patients undergoing interventions for AF elimination found that the TyG index was an independent risk factor positively correlated with AF recurrence [13]. Surveys based on populations with AF have shown a significant correlation between the TyG index and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events [53, 54]. Liu et al. observed a U-shaped relationship between the TyG index and the incidence rate of AF among participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study who were free of known cardiovascular diseases at the outset [15].

In this study, we observed a significant positive correlation between the TyG index and all-cause mortality among non-diabetic individuals, which was not evident in patients with diabetes, a finding consistent with previous studies [41, 46, 55, 56]. This discrepancy can be attributed to several factors. First, IR and glucose metabolism inherent to diabetes could result in less marked TyG index changes in patients with diabetes [51]. Second, insulin and oral hypoglycemic medications commonly used by patients with diabetes may mask the impact of the TyG index on mortality risk [41, 56]. For example, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 the cardioprotective effects in patients with AF, such as easing the cardiac load and curbing inflammation, along with Van den Berghe et al.‘s report of intensive insulin therapy cutting ICU mortality rates by half, indicated that glycemic management could be a key factor [57, 58]. Furthermore, patients with diabetes often have more severe comorbidities, such as cardiovascular events and infections, which may have a more immediate and significant effect on mortality risk [55]. However, research into these mechanisms is limited, indicating the need for further studies to better understand these interactions.

Our study highlights the TyG index as an independent correlate of mortality and a pragmatic biomarker for risk stratification in critically ill patients with AF. As an easily calculable parameter derived from routine glucose and lipid measurements upon ICU admission, the TyG index provides immediate insights into metabolic dysregulation. Consistent with prior findings by Yang et al. [28], it may complement traditional severity scores (e.g., SOFA) that rely on complex dynamic parameters, thereby enhancing the early identification of high-risk individuals. Given the global burden of AF, integrating the TyG into clinical workflows could facilitate timely resource allocation, which is critical for mitigating adverse outcomes through prioritized management. Furthermore, since elevated TyG levels may partially stem from chronic metabolic abnormalities or lifestyle factors, we cautiously speculated that dietary and lifestyle modifications to lower TyG levels could attenuate the susceptibility to major adverse events during future episodes of critical illness. Such interventions may mitigate baseline metabolic dysregulation, thereby enhancing physiological resilience to acute stressors and improving clinical outcomes. However, the translational validity of these strategies for improving prognosis under acute critical conditions requires rigorous validation through prospective high-quality studies.

The advantage of our study is that it is the largest retrospective cohort study to investigate the association between the TyG index and all-cause mortality in patients with AF. However, this study has certain limitations. First, it focused on patients with AF in the ICUs, limiting its generalizability to other populations. Second, as a single-center retrospective cohort derived from the MIMIC-IV database, our study was inevitably subject to selection bias. Third, the analysis was limited to the baseline TyG index, which overlooked dynamic variations in the TyG index across different stages of the disease. Finally, we did not conduct a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp test, preventing us from assessing the correlation between the TyG index and the gold standard of IR.

Conclusions

Our study confirmed a significant linear association between a higher TyG index and elevated all-cause mortality rates at 30, 90, and 365 days in critically ill patients with AF. These findings suggest that the TyG index is a valuable prognostic indicator capable of enhancing risk stratification and clinical management in intensive care settings. Further research is needed to explore whether interventions targeting the TyG index can improve the clinical outcomes in this patient population.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

IR:

Insulin resistance

TyG:

Triglyceride-glucose

MIMIC-IV:

Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV

ICU:

Intensive care unit

STROBE:

Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology

SAPS II:

Simplified Acute Physiology Score II

OASIS:

Oxford acute severity of illness score

TG:

Triglyceride

FBG:

Fasting blood glucose

HR:

Hazard ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

SD:

Standard deviation

IQR:

Interquartile range

AKI:

Acute kidney injury

References

  1. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, Addolorato G, Ammirati E, Baddour LM, et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990–2019. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:2982–3021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist C, et al. Corrigendum to: 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European association for cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS): the task force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European society of cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the European heart rhythm association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:4194–4194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kirchhof P. The future of atrial fibrillation management: integrated care and stratified therapy. Lancet. 2017;390:1873–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the anticoagulation and risk factors in atrial fibrillation (ATRIA) study. JAMA. 2001;285:2370.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zakynthinos GE, Tsolaki V, Oikonomou E, Vavouranakis M, Siasos G, Zakynthinos E. New-onset atrial fibrillation in the critically ill COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit. J Clin Med. 2023;12:6989.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wetterslev M, Hylander Møller M, Granholm A, Hassager C, Haase N, Lange T, et al. Atrial fibrillation (AFIB) in the ICU: incidence, risk factors, and outcomes: the international AFIB-ICU cohort study*. Crit Care Med. 2023;51:1124–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Luo Y, Dong R, Liu J, Wu B. A machine learning-based predictive model for the in-hospital mortality of critically ill patients with atrial fibrillation. Int J Med Informatics. 2024;191:105585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang A, Green JB, Halperin JL, Piccini JP. Atrial fibrillation and diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:1107–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alonso A, Yin X, Roetker NS, Magnani JW, Kronmal RA, Ellinor PT, et al. Blood lipids and the incidence of atrial fibrillation: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis and the Framingham heart study. JAHA. 2014;3:e001211.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Robins SJ, Lyass A, Zachariah JP, Massaro JM, Vasan RS. Insulin resistance and the relationship of a dyslipidemia to coronary heart disease: the Framingham heart study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31:1208–14.

  11. Polovina M, Krljanac G, Ašanin M, Seferović PM. Crouching tiger, hidden Dragon: insulin resistance and the risk of atrial fibrillation. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020;27:1931–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Terauchi Y, Inoue H, Yamashita T, Akao M, Atarashi H, Ikeda T, et al. Impact of glycated hemoglobin on 2-year clinical outcomes in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: sub-analysis of ANAFIE registry, a large observational study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023;22:175.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Jia S, Yin Y, Mou X, Zheng J, Li Z, Hu T, et al. Association between triglyceride–glucose index trajectories and radiofrequency ablation outcomes in patients with stage 3D atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024;23:121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang Z, He H, Xie Y, Li J, Luo F, Sun Z, et al. Non-insulin-based insulin resistance indexes in predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence following ablation: a retrospective study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024;23:87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu X, Abudukeremu A, Jiang Y, Cao Z, Wu M, Ma J, et al. U-shaped association between the triglyceride–glucose index and atrial fibrillation incidence in a general population without known cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023;22:118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Artunc F, Schleicher E, Weigert C, Fritsche A, Stefan N, Häring H-U. The impact of insulin resistance on the kidney and vasculature. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016;12:721–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roberts CK, Hevener AL, Barnard RJ. Metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance: underlying causes and modification by exercise training. In: Prakash YS, editor. Comprehensive Physiology [Internet]. 1st ed. Wiley; 2013 [cited 2024 Dec 31]. pp. 1–58. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/cphy.c110062

  18. Simental-Mendía LE, Rodríguez-Morán M, Guerrero-Romero F. The product of fasting glucose and triglycerides as surrogate for identifying insulin resistance in apparently healthy subjects. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2008;6:299–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nayak SS, Kuriyakose D, Polisetty LD, Patil AA, Ameen D, Bonu R, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of triglyceride glucose index: a comprehensive evaluation of meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024;23:310.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Yin J-L, Yang J, Song X-J, Qin X, Chang Y-J, Chen X, et al. Triglyceride–glucose index and health outcomes: an umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of observational studies. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024;23:177.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Avagimyan A, Pogosova N, Fogacci F, Aghajanova E, Djndoyan Z, Patoulias D, et al. Triglyceride–glucose index (TyG) as a novel biomarker in the era of cardiometabolic medicine. Int J Cardiol. 2025;418:132663.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu C, Liang D, Xiao K, Xie L. Association between the triglyceride–glucose index and all-cause and CVD mortality in the young population with diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024;23:171.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jin Z, Sun W, Huang J, Zhou M, Zhang C, Zhao B, et al. Association between triglyceride glucose index and asthma exacerbation: a population-based study. Heart Lung. 2025;70:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang Y, Huang X, Wang Y, Leng L, Xu J, Feng L, et al. The impact of triglyceride–glucose index on ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023;22:2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Gao Y-M, Chen W-J, Deng Z-L, Shang Z, Wang Y. Association between triglyceride–glucose index and risk of end-stage renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. Front Endocrinol. 2023;14:1150980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu Z, Liu L, Wang W, Cui H, Zhang Y, Xu J, et al. Triglyceride–glucose index in the prediction of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with premature coronary artery disease: a retrospective cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21:142.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. J L, Z X, X Z, Y F, J S, S C, et al. A retrospective study utilized MIMIC-IV database to explore the potential association between triglyceride–glucose index and mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis. Sci Rep. 2024;14:24081.

  28. Yang Z, Gong H, Kan F, Ji N. Association between the triglyceride glucose (TyG) index and the risk of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with heart failure: analysis of the MIMIC-IV database. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023;22:232.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Dai L, Yu Y, Wang K, Hu C, Wu D, Shan S. Association between TyG index and long-term mortality of critically ill patients: a retrospective study based on the MIMIC database. BMJ Open. 2023;13:e065256.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Cuschieri S. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019;13:31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lau DH, Linz D, Sanders P. New findings in atrial fibrillation mechanisms. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2019;11:563–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wijesurendra RS, Casadei B. Mechanisms of atrial fibrillation. Heart. 2019;105:1860–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bode D, Pronto JRD, Schiattarella GG, Voigt N. Metabolic remodelling in atrial fibrillation: manifestations, mechanisms and clinical implications. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2024;21:682–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kornej J, Börschel CS, Benjamin EJ, Schnabel RB. Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation in the 21st century: novel methods and new insights. Circul Res. 2020;127:4–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chan Y-H, Chang G-J, Lai Y-J, Chen W-J, Chang S-H, Hung L-M, et al. Atrial fibrillation and its arrhythmogenesis associated with insulin resistance. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019;18:125.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Maria Z, Campolo AR, Scherlag BJ, Ritchey JW, Lacombe VA. Dysregulation of insulin-sensitive glucose transporters during insulin resistance-induced atrial fibrillation. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Mol Basis Dis. 2018;1864:987–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ormazabal V, Nair S, Elfeky O, Aguayo C, Salomon C, Zuñiga FA. Association between insulin resistance and the development of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17:122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Laakso M, Kuusisto J. Insulin resistance and hyperglycaemia in cardiovascular disease development. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10:293–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Vlachopoulos C, Dima I, Aznaouridis K, Vasiliadou C, Ioakeimidis N, Aggeli C, et al. Acute systemic inflammation increases arterial stiffness and decreases wave reflections in healthy individuals. Circulation. 2005;112:2193–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lu J. Research progress of triglyceride glucose index in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Adv Clin Med. 2024;14:1841–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang R, Shi S, Chen W, Wang Y, Lin X, Zhao Y, et al. Independent effects of the triglyceride–glucose index on all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with coronary heart disease: analysis of the MIMIC-III database. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023;22:10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhou Y, Pan Y, Yan H, Wang Y, Li Z, Zhao X, et al. Triglyceride glucose index and prognosis of patients with ischemic stroke. Front Neurol. 2020;11:456.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhao Q, Cheng Y-J, Xu Y-K, Zhao Z-W, Liu C, Sun T-N, et al. Comparison of various insulin resistance surrogates on prognostic prediction and stratification following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20:190.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Guerrero-Romero F, Simental-Mendía LE, González-Ortiz M, Martínez-Abundis E, Ramos-Zavala MG, Hernández-González SO, et al. The product of triglycerides and glucose, a simple measure of insulin sensitivity. Comparison with the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:3347–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Vasques ACJ, Novaes FS, De Oliveira MDS, Matos Souza JR, Yamanaka A, Pareja JC, et al. TyG index performs better than HOMA in a Brazilian population: a hyperglycemic clamp validated study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;93:e98–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Cai W, Xu J, Wu X, Chen Z, Zeng L, Song X, et al. Association between triglyceride–glucose index and all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with ischemic stroke: analysis of the MIMIC-IV database. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023;22:138.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhai G, Wang J, Liu Y, Zhou Y. Triglyceride–glucose index linked to in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with heart disease. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022;23:263.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Li S, Guo B, Chen H, Shi Z, Li Y, Tian Q, et al. The role of the triglyceride (triacylglycerol) glucose index in the development of cardiovascular events: a retrospective cohort analysis. Sci Rep. 2019;9:7320.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Feng Q, Lv Z, Ba CX, Zhang YQ. Predictive value of triglyceride–glucose index for the occurrence of acute respiratory failure in asthmatic patients of MIMIC-IV database. Sci Rep. 2024;14:28631.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhou Z, Liu Q, Zheng M, Zuo Z, Zhang G, Shi R, et al. Comparative study on the predictive value of TG/HDL-C, TyG and TyG-BMI indices for 5-year mortality in critically ill patients with chronic heart failure: a retrospective study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024;23:213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Chen S, Mei Q, Guo L, Yang X, Luo W, Qu X, et al. Association between triglyceride–glucose index and atrial fibrillation: a retrospective observational study. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:1047927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ling Y, Fu C, Fan Q, Liu J, Jiang L, Tang S. Triglyceride–glucose index and new-onset atrial fibrillation in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients after percutaneous coronary intervention. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:838761.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Yin C, Hou Q, Qi Q, Han Q, Wang X, Wu S, et al. Triglyceride–Glucose index predicts major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation. Int Heart J. 2024;65:373–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Gong A, Cao Y, Li Z, Li W, Li F, Tong Y, et al. Association between triglyceride glucose index and adverse cardiovascular prognosis in patients with atrial fibrillation without diabetes: a retrospective cohort study. Lipids Health Dis. 2025;24:23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Nie M, Jiang B, Xu Y. Association between the triglyceride–glucose index and mortality in critically ill patients: A meta-analysis. Medicine. 2024;103:e39262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Liao Y, Zhang R, Shi S, Zhao Y, He Y, Liao L, et al. Triglyceride–glucose index linked to all-cause mortality in critically ill patients: a cohort of 3026 patients. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21:128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Fichadiya A, Quinn A, Au F, Campbell D, Lau D, Ronksley P, et al. Association between sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and arrhythmic outcomes in patients with diabetes and pre-existing atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2024;26:euae054.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Van Den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1359–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University for their support. We also acknowledge Jie Liu (People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China), Qilin Yang (The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China), and Jun Gao (Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China) for their contributions to the study design consultations.

Data sharing statement

The corresponding author will provide the datasets used and analyzed during the current work upon reasonable request.

Funding

This work was supported by the Research project supported by shanxi scholarship council of China (NO. 2022–200), Shanxi Science and Technology Department Basic Research Program for Young Researchers in the Category of Free Exploration (NO. 202203021212055), and COVID-19 research project supported by Health Commission of shanxi province (NO. 2023XG029).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RD designed the study, conducted data collection and analysis, drafted the manuscript, and reviewed the manuscript. EC, MW, LP, LY, YH, XZ, CX, and JL performed data analysis and reviewed the manuscript. JG and HZ designed the study and reviewed the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jiannan Gong or Hui Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research was conducted in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration’s guidelines. Approval for using the MIMIC-IV database was obtained from the IRBs of both MIT and BIDMC. The ethical approval previously granted for the MIMIC database covers the data used in this study, obviating the need for further ethical approval or informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, R., Cheng, E., Wei, M. et al. Association between triglyceride–glucose index and mortality in critically ill patients with atrial fibrillation: a retrospective cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 24, 138 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12933-025-02697-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12933-025-02697-6

Keywords