Skip to main content

Table 4 Dynamics of biomarker levels in the study groups after 6 months of follow-up

From: Effects of empagliflozin on functional capacity, LV filling pressure, and cardiac reserves in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a randomized controlled open-label trial

Variables

Empagliflozin (n = 35)

Control (n = 35)

Difference between groups (95% CI)

P Value for intergroup differences

Baseline

Change from baseline (95% CI)

6 months

Change from baseline (95% CI)

NT-proBNP, pg/mL

214 (163–258)

− 11 (− 50, 57)

240 (180–431)

28 (5, 72)

53 (3, 95)

0.038

NT-proBNP > mediane, pg/mL

261 (228–332)

− 61 (− 121, − 2)

432 (286–644)

80 (6, 173)

130 (54, 238)

0.0029

sST2, ng/mL

25.9 (13.3–28.3)

− 1.2 (− 2.9, − 0.4)

24.4 (18.5–27.9)

0.9 (− 0.3, 2.1)

2.3 (0.9, 3.8)

0.019

sST2 > mediane, ng/mL

28.3 (27.7–31.0)

− 1.5 (− 3.2, 0.4)

27.5 (25.3–32.9)

1.6 (− 0.2, 3.2)

3.1 (1.2, 5.0)

0.0014

hsCRP, mg/L

2.1 (0.7–3.3)

− 0.3 (− 0.8, 0.1)

1.6 (0.8–2.9)

− 0.1 (− 0.4, 0.5)

0.4 (− 0.1, 1.0)

0.057

hsCRP > mediane, mg/L

3.3 (2.5–6.3)

− 0.8 (− 2.7, 0.1)

2.9 (2.0–6.0)

− 0.3 (− 1.2, 0.5)

0.3 (− 0.7, 1.4)

0.33

  1. Baseline and follow-up data are presented as medians (interquartile ranges), and the dynamics of the variables are presented as the mean change from the baseline values (95% confidence intervals)
  2. hsCRP High-sensitivity C-reactive protein, NT-proBNP N-terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide, sST2 Soluble interleukin 1 receptor-like 1